Radeon RX 6700S vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti with Radeon RX 6700S, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.76

RX 6700S outperforms GTX 980 Ti by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking123108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.29no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM200Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161792
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate176 billion/sec224.0
Floating-point performance6,060 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX 6700S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB10 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.76
RX 6700S 38.64
+8.1%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13813
RX 6700S 14922
+8%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 8% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Ti 23057
RX 6700S 32662
+41.7%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 42% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Ti 48631
RX 6700S 75332
+54.9%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 55% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 16961
RX 6700S 24135
+42.3%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 42% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 98958
RX 6700S 153853
+55.5%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 980 Ti by 55% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
−13.9%
115
+13.9%
1440p52
−28.8%
67
+28.8%
4K52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Battlefield 5 47 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 36 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 49 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 72 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 66 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 42 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how GTX 980 Ti and RX 6700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700S is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700S is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.76 38.64
Recency 2 June 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX 6700S.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6700S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1412 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 203 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.