Quadro K500M vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Place in performance ranking	130	999
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	4.17	0.61
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM200	N14M-Q1
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 June 2015 (8 years old)	1 June 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	no data
Current price	$1195 (1.8x MSRP)	$19.95

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 Ti has 584% better value for money than Quadro K500M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	192
CUDA cores	2816	no data
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	850 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	8,000 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	176 billion/sec	13.60
Floating-point performance	6,060 gflops	326.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Quadro K500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin + 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3 / GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.66
+2776%

Quadro K500M 1.24

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms Quadro K500M by 2776% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13811
+2777%

Quadro K500M 480

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms Quadro K500M by 2777% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	101 +3267%	3−4 −3267%
1440p	49 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
4K	50 +4900%	1−2 −4900%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+1450%

4−5

−1450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +3150%	2−3 −3150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +3433%	3−4 −3433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +978%	9−10 −978%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1450%	4−5 −1450%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +2933%	3−4 −2933%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +2833%	3−4 −2833%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	0−1
Hitman 3	110−120 +11200%	1−2 −11200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +7600%	1−2 −7600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +1800%	3−4 −1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +1114%	7−8 −1114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +3150%	2−3 −3150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +3433%	3−4 −3433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +322%	9−10 −322%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1450%	4−5 −1450%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +2933%	3−4 −2933%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +2833%	3−4 −2833%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	0−1
Hitman 3	110−120 +11200%	1−2 −11200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +7600%	1−2 −7600%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +3050%	2−3 −3050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +1800%	3−4 −1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +371%	7−8 −371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +2100%	4−5 −2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	46 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Battlefield 5	94 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +1450%	4−5 −1450%
Far Cry 5	77 +3750%	2−3 −3750%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +2833%	3−4 −2833%
Forza Horizon 4	72	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	54 +1700%	3−4 −1700%
Hitman 3	65−70 +1525%	4−5 −1525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +513%	8−9 −513%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +3700%	1−2 −3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +940%	5−6 −940%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +3700%	2−3 −3700%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +3150%	2−3 −3150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +3650%	2−3 −3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +2350%	2−3 −2350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Hitman 3	35−40 +3400%	1−2 −3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Metro Exodus	24−27	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	23	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +4300%	1−2 −4300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Battlefield 5	40 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	0−1
Far Cry 5	30 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +640%	5−6 −640%
Forza Horizon 4	42 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	0−1