650 Ti Boost vs 980 Ti

#ad
Buy
Ti
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 980 Ti
35.66
+312%

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 312% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking129459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.140.97
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM200GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (8 years old)26 March 2013 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $169
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)$285 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 Ti has 327% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
CUDA cores2816768
Core clock speed1000 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt134 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate176 billion/sec62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance6,060 gflops1,585 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)9.5" (24.1 cm)
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinOne 6-pin
SLI options++

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s144.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displays4 Displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
3D Vision Liveno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.66
+312%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.65

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 312% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13822
+312%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 3354

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 312% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+286%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 286% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 980 Ti 37300
+298%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 9364

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 298% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 980 Ti 52856
+502%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8785

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 502% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 980 Ti 35714
+425%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 6809

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 425% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 980 Ti 126
+367%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 27

980 Ti outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 367% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+321%
24−27
−321%
1440p49
+390%
10−12
−390%
4K50
+317%
12−14
−317%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+342%
24−27
−342%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+362%
21−24
−362%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+363%
24−27
−363%
Hitman 3 110−120
+319%
27−30
−319%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+375%
12−14
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+372%
18−20
−372%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+342%
24−27
−342%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+333%
21−24
−333%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+363%
24−27
−363%
Hitman 3 110−120
+319%
27−30
−319%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+328%
18−20
−328%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+350%
14−16
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+375%
12−14
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
+360%
10−11
−360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Battlefield 5 94
+348%
21−24
−348%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Far Cry 5 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+350%
16−18
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+321%
14−16
−321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+319%
16−18
−319%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
Hitman 3 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+357%
7−8
−357%
Hitman 3 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+340%
10−11
−340%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Battlefield 5 40
+344%
9−10
−344%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and GTX 650 Ti Boost compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 321% faster than GTX 650 Ti Boost

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 390% faster than GTX 650 Ti Boost

4K resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 317% faster than GTX 650 Ti Boost

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 35.66 8.65
Recency 2 June 2015 26 March 2013
Cost $649 $169
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 134 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1342 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 325 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.