GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB vs 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.77
+135%

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking123328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.295.45
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM200N17P-G1 Max-Q
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)30 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)$1010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB has 27% better value for money than GTX 980 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161280
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1063 - 1265 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1341 - 1480 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 - 70 Watt
Texture fill rate176 billion/sec118.4
Floating-point performance6,060 gflops3,789 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6.144 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support++
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.77
+135%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 15.25

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Ti 23057
+72.9%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 13334

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 73% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+62.6%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 10430

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 63% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 98958
+33.5%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 74101

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 34% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 980 Ti 443119
+20.4%
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 367999

980 Ti outperforms 1060 Max-Q 6 GB by 20% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+21.7%
83
−21.7%
1440p52
+148%
21−24
−148%
4K52
+73.3%
30
−73.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Battlefield 5 47 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 36 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Metro Exodus 49 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 72 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 66 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 42 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how GTX 980 Ti and GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 22% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 148% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 73% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.77 15.25
Recency 2 June 2015 30 May 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1411 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 185 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.