RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile with RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
36.45

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms GTX 980 SLI Mobile by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14419
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4226.62
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 September 2015 (9 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409610496
Core clock speed1126 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data858.4
Floating-point processing powerno data54.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
−89.8%
260−270
+89.8%
4K68
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−71.6%
350−400
+71.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
God of War 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−87.5%
240−250
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−71.6%
350−400
+71.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−86.4%
220−230
+86.4%
Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−89.7%
220−230
+89.7%
God of War 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−84.9%
270−280
+84.9%
Valorant 210−220
−83.5%
400−450
+83.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−87.5%
240−250
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−71.6%
350−400
+71.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−79.9%
500−550
+79.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Dota 2 140−150
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−86.4%
220−230
+86.4%
Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−89.7%
220−230
+89.7%
God of War 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−87%
230−240
+87%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−83.9%
160−170
+83.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−84.9%
270−280
+84.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
−89.4%
250−260
+89.4%
Valorant 210−220
−83.5%
400−450
+83.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−87.5%
240−250
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Dota 2 140−150
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−86.4%
220−230
+86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−90.1%
270−280
+90.1%
God of War 85−90
−81.8%
160−170
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−84.9%
270−280
+84.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Valorant 210−220
−83.5%
400−450
+83.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−86.8%
170−180
+86.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−75.8%
450−500
+75.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 250−260
−79.3%
450−500
+79.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−89.5%
180−190
+89.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−82.7%
190−200
+82.7%
God of War 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−86.3%
95−100
+86.3%
Valorant 220−230
−77.8%
400−450
+77.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Dota 2 100−110
−86.9%
200−210
+86.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
God of War 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 91% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.45 69.85
Recency 22 September 2015 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 200 Watt

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a 91.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 65% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 45 votes

Rate RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile or RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.