Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Arc A730M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
38.54
+9.1%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking109135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation80.09no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIAlchemist
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 September 2015 (8 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$301 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1126 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors10400 Million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data211.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Arc A730M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 38.54
+9.1%
Arc A730M 35.31

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 33169
+13.8%
Arc A730M 29144

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 47704
Arc A730M 63380
+32.9%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile by 33% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 25453
+19.5%
Arc A730M 21294

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 20% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 155238
+86.1%
Arc A730M 83396

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms Arc A730M by 86% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD139
+93.1%
72
−93.1%
1440p45−50
+2.3%
44
−2.3%
4K68
+172%
25
−172%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 93% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 2% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 172% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.54 35.31
Recency 22 September 2015 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 120 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Arc A730M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 65 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 107 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.