Quadro K2200 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M SLI with Quadro K2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M SLI
2014
2x 6 GB GDDR5, 162 Watt
21.09
+160%

970M SLI outperforms K2200 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking284531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.31
Power efficiency10.539.63
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2014 (11 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$395.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed924 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)162 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.96
Floating-point processing powerno data1.439 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA+5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+193%
30−35
−193%
4K41
+193%
14−16
−193%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data13.19
4Kno data28.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Fortnite 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+200%
30−33
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Valorant 160−170
+167%
60−65
−167%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+187%
45−50
−187%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+164%
95−100
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Dota 2 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Fortnite 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+200%
30−33
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+183%
30−33
−183%
Valorant 160−170
+167%
60−65
−167%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Dota 2 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+200%
30−33
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Valorant 160−170
+167%
60−65
−167%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+185%
40−45
−185%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+170%
60−65
−170%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
Valorant 190−200
+163%
75−80
−163%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Valorant 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

This is how GTX 970M SLI and Quadro K2200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970M SLI is 193% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970M SLI is 193% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.09 8.10
Recency 7 October 2014 22 July 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 162 Watt 68 Watt

GTX 970M SLI has a 160.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

Quadro K2200, on the other hand, has 138.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 460 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 970M SLI or Quadro K2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.