GeForce RTX 5060 vs GTX 970M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M SLI with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M SLI
2014
2x 6 GB GDDR5, 162 Watt
20.99
+15.5%

GTX 970M SLI outperforms RTX 5060 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking240271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.238.45
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)March 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
Core clock speed924 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)162 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data362.9
Floating-point processing powerno data23.22 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2x 6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
4K41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+17%
50−55
−17%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+15.8%
110−120
−15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+17%
50−55
−17%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+11%
80−85
−11%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+15.8%
110−120
−15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+14.9%
65−70
−14.9%
Fortnite 110−120
+10.6%
100−110
−10.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+15.9%
60−65
−15.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
Valorant 160−170
+9.6%
140−150
−9.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+17%
50−55
−17%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+11%
80−85
−11%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+15.8%
110−120
−15.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+7.3%
230−240
−7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%
Dota 2 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+14.9%
65−70
−14.9%
Fortnite 110−120
+10.6%
100−110
−10.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+15.9%
60−65
−15.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+13.5%
70−75
−13.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Valorant 160−170
+9.6%
140−150
−9.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+11%
80−85
−11%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%
Dota 2 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+14.9%
65−70
−14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
−18.8%
55−60
+18.8%
Valorant 160−170
+9.6%
140−150
−9.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+10.6%
100−110
−10.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+19%
40−45
−19%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+13.3%
140−150
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+20.6%
30−35
−20.6%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
−1.8%
Valorant 190−200
+8.2%
180−190
−8.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+14.3%
55−60
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Valorant 130−140
+17.7%
110−120
−17.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Dota 2 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%

This is how GTX 970M SLI and RTX 5060 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970M SLI is 17% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970M SLI is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 970M SLI is 49% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5060 is 19% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 970M SLI is ahead in 58 tests (97%)
  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.99 18.18
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 162 Watt 170 Watt

GTX 970M SLI has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 4.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 5060 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 444 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 970M SLI or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.