GeForce GTS 350M vs GTX 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970 with GeForce GTS 350M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 145 Watt
24.97
+2278%

GTX 970 outperforms GTS 350M by a whopping 2278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2001056
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.700.04
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameGM204n11e-ge1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$105 (0.3x MSRP)$230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 970 has 59150% better value for money than GTS 350M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166496
CUDA cores166496
Core clock speed1050 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109 billion/sec16.00
Floating-point performance3,920 gflops240 gflops
Gigaflopsno data360

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTS 350M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinsno data
SLI options++
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sUp to 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970 24.97
+2278%
GTS 350M 1.05

GTX 970 outperforms GTS 350M by 2278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970 9643
+2269%
GTS 350M 407

GTX 970 outperforms GTS 350M by 2269% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD83
+2667%
3−4
−2667%
1440p59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
4K40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 80−85
+2600%
3−4
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+2633%
3−4
−2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 46 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 20 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data

This is how GTX 970 and GTS 350M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is 2667% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970 is 2850% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970 is 3900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.97 1.05
Recency 19 September 2014 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 28 Watt

The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while GeForce GTS 350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GTS 350M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4390 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.