ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5171611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.23no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM206SR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2016 (10 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown23 Watt
Texture fill rate73.601
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs646
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3875
+193650%
Samples: 1087
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46no data
1440p25no data
4K21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 52 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 38 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 47 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 43 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Dota 2 84 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Fortnite 34 no data
Forza Horizon 4 41 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 15 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Dota 2 77 no data
Far Cry 5 32 no data
Forza Horizon 4 28 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 34 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 19 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 44 no data
Far Cry 5 10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 965M has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.