ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3161611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.12no data
Power efficiency7.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM204R100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.82 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1064 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100-200 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate136.21
Floating-point processing power4.358 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1286
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s166 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99no data
4K46no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.00no data
4K8.60no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 84 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2015 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 980 Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 335% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 Mobile and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 83 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 Mobile or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.