GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs GTX 965M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 965M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
9.75

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 688% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.9217.29
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN16E-GS, N16E-GRAmpere GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999
Current price$1546 $1251 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3090 Ti has 1779% better value for money than GTX 965M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102410752
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speed950 / 1151 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown450 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60625.0
Floating-point performance2,355 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.75
RTX 3090 Ti 76.85
+688%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 688% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 965M 3775
RTX 3090 Ti 29754
+688%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 688% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 7322
RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+849%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 849% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 5536
RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+859%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 859% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 34748
RTX 3090 Ti 246319
+609%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 609% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 965M 259766
RTX 3090 Ti 564087
+117%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 965M by 117% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−357%
210
+357%
1440p25
−460%
140
+460%
4K21
−381%
101
+381%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1360%
219
+1360%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
−274%
110−120
+274%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−967%
160
+967%
Battlefield 5 52
−219%
160−170
+219%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−585%
170−180
+585%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1240%
201
+1240%
Far Cry 5 38
−345%
160−170
+345%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−266%
130−140
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−362%
210−220
+362%
Hitman 3 24−27
−764%
210−220
+764%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−745%
160−170
+745%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−755%
265
+755%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−906%
171
+906%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−383%
110−120
+383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−820%
138
+820%
Battlefield 5 43
−286%
160−170
+286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−585%
170−180
+585%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1053%
173
+1053%
Far Cry 5 35
−383%
160−170
+383%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
−297%
130−140
+297%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−429%
210−220
+429%
Hitman 3 24−27
−764%
210−220
+764%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−745%
160−170
+745%
Metro Exodus 15
−1087%
178
+1087%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−1831%
251
+1831%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−1171%
394
+1171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−806%
154
+806%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−792%
110−120
+792%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−720%
123
+720%
Battlefield 5 35
−374%
160−170
+374%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−913%
152
+913%
Far Cry 5 32
−428%
160−170
+428%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
−334%
130−140
+334%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−675%
210−220
+675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−972%
193
+972%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−665%
130
+665%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−907%
140−150
+907%
Hitman 3 14−16
−1073%
170−180
+1073%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−793%
130−140
+793%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1463%
125
+1463%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1014%
75−80
+1014%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1315%
184
+1315%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−770%
85−90
+770%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2060%
108
+2060%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−813%
140−150
+813%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1980%
104
+1980%
Far Cry 5 22
−573%
140−150
+573%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−669%
120−130
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−939%
180−190
+939%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1533%
140−150
+1533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1383%
85−90
+1383%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1056%
100−110
+1056%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2020%
106
+2020%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−1231%
173
+1231%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1200%
100−110
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
Far Cry 5 10
−850%
95−100
+850%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
−203%
90−95
+203%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−907%
140−150
+907%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−2233%
70
+2233%

This is how GTX 965M and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 357% faster than GTX 965M in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 460% faster than GTX 965M in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 381% faster than GTX 965M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 5200% faster than the GTX 965M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3090 Ti surpassed GTX 965M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.75 76.85
Recency 5 January 2015 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 105 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3029 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.