Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI with Quadro M2000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
17.30
+93.3%

GTX 965M SLI outperforms M2000M by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking295454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.072.52
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$149 $363

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 965M SLI has 1173% better value for money than M2000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed924 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1197 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.92
Floating-point performanceno data1,405 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Quadro M2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M SLI 17.30
+93.3%
M2000M 8.95

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Quadro M2000M by 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M SLI 14428
+181%
M2000M 5143

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Quadro M2000M by 181% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M SLI 10207
+146%
M2000M 4157

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Quadro M2000M by 146% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M SLI 51182
+71.8%
M2000M 29795

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Quadro M2000M by 72% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+122%
32
−122%
4K21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+88%
24−27
−88%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+81.8%
40−45
−81.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+92%
24−27
−92%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+88%
24−27
−88%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+81.8%
40−45
−81.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+92%
24−27
−92%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+60.9%
23
−60.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+81.8%
40−45
−81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+164%
14
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+92%
24−27
−92%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
Hitman 3 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Hitman 3 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9
−88.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M SLI is 122% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 965M SLI is 91% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 965M SLI is 275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 965M SLI surpassed M2000M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.30 8.95
Recency 5 January 2015 2 October 2015

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 461 vote

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.