1650 Ti Mobile vs 965M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 965M SLI
17.24

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 965M SLI by 17% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking291255
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Value for money30.1418.01
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameno dataN18P-G62
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years old)2 April 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$149 $892
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 965M SLI has 67% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed924 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data95.04

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M SLI and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M SLI 17.24
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.11
+16.6%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 965M SLI by 17% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M SLI 14428
+8.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

965M SLI outperforms 1650 Ti Mobile by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M SLI 10207
+2.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

965M SLI outperforms 1650 Ti Mobile by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M SLI 51182
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+27.3%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 965M SLI by 27% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 965M SLI 250259
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+63.9%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 965M SLI by 64% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
+22%
59
−22%
1440p35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%
4K18−21
−33.3%
24
+33.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−119%
59
+119%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−69.4%
61
+69.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−69%
49
+69%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−44.8%
84
+44.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−61.4%
71
+61.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−70.4%
46
+70.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−48.9%
67
+48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−40.4%
66
+40.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−15%
65−70
+15%
Hitman 3 45−50
−72.9%
83
+72.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−72.2%
62
+72.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−92.9%
54
+92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−80.6%
65
+80.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−81.8%
60
+81.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−27.8%
46
+27.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−10.3%
32
+10.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−25.9%
73
+25.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−31.8%
58
+31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−33.3%
36
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−37.8%
62
+37.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−31.9%
62
+31.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−15%
65−70
+15%
Hitman 3 45−50
−39.6%
67
+39.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−30.6%
47
+30.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−40.7%
38
+40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−47.2%
53
+47.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−94.6%
72
+94.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−57.6%
52
+57.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+93.3%
15
−93.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−15.5%
67
+15.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−25.9%
34
+25.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−28.9%
58
+28.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−21.3%
57
+21.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−15%
65−70
+15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−5.4%
39
+5.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+50%
22
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−48%
37
+48%
Hitman 3 27−30
−44.4%
39
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−30.8%
17
+30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−45.5%
32
+45.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−37.8%
51
+37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−21.4%
30−35
+21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−63.6%
18
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−47.1%
25
+47.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−47.4%
28
+47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 965M SLI is 22% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 25.7% faster than GTX 965M SLI

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 33.3% faster than GTX 965M SLI

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 965M SLI is 93.3% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 119% faster than the GTX 965M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 965M SLI is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 65 tests (96%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 17.24 20.11
Recency 5 January 2015 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1361 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.