Tesla K20X vs GeForce GTX 960A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.02no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402688
Core clock speed1029 MHz732 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40164.0
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs40224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s249.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.03.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 235 Watt

GTX 960A has an age advantage of 2 years, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20X, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla K20X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook card while Tesla K20X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIA Tesla K20X
Tesla K20X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 51 vote

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.