GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs GTX 960A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.02no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGM107GK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1029 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4028.86
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data115 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.03.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 29 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 960A has an age advantage of 1 year.

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960A and GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.