ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs GeForce GTX 960A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.09no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM107Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1029 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.400.08
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs401

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s600 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

GTX 960A has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960A and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 960A
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.