Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs GeForce GTX 960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking322not rated
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.25no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameGM206Cedar Trail
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244
Core clock speed1127 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate75.39no data
Floating-point performance2,413 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 January 2015 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GTX 960 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960 is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3544 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 22 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.