GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs GTX 960

Place in the ranking	341	181
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.87	no data
Power efficiency	9.15	18.45
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM206	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	22 January 2015 (9 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1920
Core clock speed	1127 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	75.39	144.0
Floating-point processing power	2.413 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	64	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	400 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	+
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960 15.76

RTX 2060 Mobile 30.44
+93.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 960 10768

RTX 2060 Mobile 21262
+97.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 960 30751

RTX 2060 Mobile 57644
+87.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 960 7916

RTX 2060 Mobile 16331
+106%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 960 49918

RTX 2060 Mobile 99179
+98.7%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 960 310860

RTX 2060 Mobile 411721
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 −61.9%	102 +61.9%
1440p	30−35 −110%	63 +110%
4K	28 −39.3%	39 +39.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.16	no data
1440p	6.63	no data
4K	7.11	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−96%

45−50
+96%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −153%	91 +153%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −173%	71 +173%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −133%	119 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −175%	88 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −96%	45−50 +96%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −184%	105 +184%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −156%	110 +156%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −262%	366 +262%
Hitman 3	30−33 −177%	83 +177%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −182%	223 +182%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −141%	130 +141%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −133%	100 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −190%	148 +190%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −184%	227 +184%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −197%	107 +197%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −115%	56 +115%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −106%	105 +106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −147%	79 +147%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −96%	45−50 +96%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −130%	85 +130%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −90.7%	82 +90.7%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −177%	280 +177%
Hitman 3	30−33 −150%	75 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −148%	196 +148%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −107%	112 +107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −74.4%	75 +74.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −141%	123 +141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	131 +111%	60−65 −111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −138%	190 +138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −38.9%	50 +38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −84.6%	48 +84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −81.3%	58 +81.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −96%	45−50 +96%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −67.6%	62 +67.6%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +14.8%	88 −14.8%
Hitman 3	30−33 −120%	66 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −19%	94 +19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −110%	107 +110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −114%	60 +114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +111%	38 −111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−83.7%

79
+83.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −117%	65 +117%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −125%	54 +125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −150%	40 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −192%	38 +192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −147%	42 +147%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −133%	42 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −196%	246 +196%
Hitman 3	18−20 −142%	46 +142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −119%	70 +119%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −100%	55−60 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −131%	65−70 +131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −124%	35−40 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −119%	210 +119%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−138%

62
+138%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −113%	32 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Hitman 3	10−12 −155%	28 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −8.9%	86 +8.9%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −160%	39 +160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −178%	25 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −175%	22 +175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −163%	21 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −138%	35−40 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −150%	15 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−114%

30
+114%

This is how GTX 960 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 62% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 110% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 39% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 960 is 111% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 262% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 960 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.76	30.44
Recency	22 January 2015	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 93.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 4.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.