NVS 810 vs GeForce GTX 950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 950M
2015
4 GB DDR3 or GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.69
+119%

GeForce GTX 950M outperforms NVS 810 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking531727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.850.11
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN16P-GTGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years ago)4 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$797 $848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 950M has 673% better value for money than NVS 810.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed914 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9633.06
Floating-point performance1,439 gflops2x 1,058 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 950M and NVS 810 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3 or GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 or 2500 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 or 80 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950M 6.69
+119%
NVS 810 3.05

GeForce GTX 950M outperforms NVS 810 by 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 950M 2584
+119%
NVS 810 1179

GeForce GTX 950M outperforms NVS 810 by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
+121%
14−16
−121%
1440p23
+130%
10−12
−130%
4K16
+129%
7−8
−129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Hitman 3 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+129%
21−24
−129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Hitman 3 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Metro Exodus 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Metro Exodus 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+136%
14−16
−136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+125%
8−9
−125%

This is how GTX 950M and NVS 810 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950M is 121% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950M is 130% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 950M is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.69 3.05
Recency 12 March 2015 4 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 68 Watt

The GeForce GTX 950M is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1018 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.