Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce GTX 950A

Place in performance ranking	534	175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$1099	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2048
Core clock speed	993 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	2300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	44.96	320.0
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	MXM Module	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.03 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950A 6.63

RX 7600M XT 29.71
+348%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms GeForce GTX 950A by 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 950A 2560

RX 7600M XT 11474
+348%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms GeForce GTX 950A by 348% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −363%	111 +363%
1440p	12−14 −400%	60 +400%
4K	7−8 −357%	32 +357%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−400%

50−55
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −363%	125 +363%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −377%	143 +377%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −362%	95−100 +362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −379%	65−70 +379%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −375%	75−80 +375%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −374%	237 +374%
Hitman 3	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −392%	246 +392%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −380%	144 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −381%	75−80 +381%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −362%	254 +362%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −353%	136 +353%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −375%	114 +375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −383%	116 +383%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −362%	95−100 +362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −379%	65−70 +379%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −375%	75−80 +375%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −356%	120−130 +356%
Hitman 3	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −392%	110−120 +392%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −352%	122 +352%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −381%	75−80 +381%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −353%	204 +353%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −391%	172 +391%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −400%	80−85 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −394%	79 +394%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −417%	93 +417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −379%	65−70 +379%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −397%	174 +397%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −396%	134 +396%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −406%	177 +406%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −371%	99 +371%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −390%	49 +390%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−381%

75−80
+381%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −367%	55−60 +367%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −359%	124 +359%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −400%	60 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −379%	67 +379%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −381%	101 +381%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −360%	138 +360%
Hitman 3	8−9 −350%	35−40 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −386%	102 +386%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −406%	91 +406%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −396%	119 +396%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −350%	72 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −386%	34 +386%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−400%

50−55
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Hitman 3	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −371%	33 +371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −420%	52 +420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −394%	89 +394%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −400%	60 +400%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −367%	56 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −467%	17 +467%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−420%

24−27

+420%

This is how GTX 950A and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 363% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 400% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 357% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.63	29.71
Recency	13 March 2015	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt