Radeon HD 8410G vs GeForce GTX 950A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
940MX 945M GTX 850A GTX 850M GTX 860M GTX 860M OEM GTX 950A GTX 950M GTX 950M Mac Edition GTX 960A GTX 960M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8180 8210 8210E 8240 Mobile IGP 8250 8280 Mobile IGP 8280E 8310E 8310G 8330 Mobile IGP 8330E 8350G 8400 Mobile IGP 8400E 8410G 8450G 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8510G 8530M 8550G 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 8550M 8570A 8570M 8590M 8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M 8730A 8730M 8750A 8750M 8770M 8790M 8830M 8850M 8870M 8950M 8970M 8970M Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon HD 8410G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 950A
2015
2 GB DDR3, 75 Watt
6.18
+494%

950A outperforms HD 8410G by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 950A GTX 950A
HD 8410G HD 8410G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6211138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.352.29
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGM107Scrapper
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed993 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz720 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate44.968.640
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.2765 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs4012
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32.03 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 950A 6.18
+494%
HD 8410G 1.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950A 2598
+497%
Samples: 70
HD 8410G 435
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.18 1.04
Recency 13 March 2015 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 950A has a 494.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8410G, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 950A is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GeForce 800A GeForce 800A
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
vs
A30X A30X
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
vs
RTX 4090 D GeForce RTX 4090 D
GTX 950A GTX 950A
vs
GTX 560M GTX 560M
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
Iris Graphics 550 Iris Graphics 550
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
HD 8180 Radeon HD 8180
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
HD 8550 OEM Radeon HD 8550 OEM
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
HD 7510 OEM Radeon HD 7510 OEM
GTX 950A GTX 950A
vs
GTX 680 Mac Edition GTX 680 Mac Edition
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950A or Radeon HD 8410G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.