Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce GTX 950

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon HD 4670, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 90 Watt
13.82
+1310%

GTX 950 outperforms ATI HD 4670 by a whopping 1310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3511072
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.030.01
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM206RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 August 2015 (8 years ago)10 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $67
Current price$12.88 (0.1x MSRP)$181 (2.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 950 has 60200% better value for money than ATI HD 4670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768320
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate49.2 billion/sec24.00
Floating-point performance1,825 gflops480.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length7.938" (20.2 cm)193 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinsNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.22x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.82
+1310%
ATI HD 4670 0.98

GeForce GTX 950 outperforms Radeon HD 4670 by 1310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 950 5338
+1305%
ATI HD 4670 380

GeForce GTX 950 outperforms Radeon HD 4670 by 1305% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
4K21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 290−300
+1281%
21−24
−1281%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+1264%
21−24
−1264%
Battlefield 5 600−650
+1233%
45−50
−1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 290−300
+1281%
21−24
−1281%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+1306%
30−35
−1306%
Far Cry New Dawn 500−550
+1216%
35−40
−1216%
Forza Horizon 4 900−950
+1264%
65−70
−1264%
Hitman 3 350−400
+1246%
24−27
−1246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+1239%
55−60
−1239%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+1204%
45−50
−1204%
Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+1295%
40−45
−1295%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+1204%
45−50
−1204%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+1264%
21−24
−1264%
Battlefield 5 600−650
+1233%
45−50
−1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 290−300
+1281%
21−24
−1281%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+1306%
30−35
−1306%
Far Cry New Dawn 500−550
+1216%
35−40
−1216%
Forza Horizon 4 900−950
+1264%
65−70
−1264%
Hitman 3 350−400
+1246%
24−27
−1246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+1239%
55−60
−1239%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+1204%
45−50
−1204%
Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+1295%
40−45
−1295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 500−550
+1216%
38
−1216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+1204%
45−50
−1204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+1264%
21−24
−1264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 290−300
+1281%
21−24
−1281%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+1306%
30−35
−1306%
Forza Horizon 4 900−950
+1264%
65−70
−1264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+1239%
55−60
−1239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+1295%
40−45
−1295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 290−300
+1281%
21
−1281%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+1204%
45−50
−1204%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 350−400
+1196%
27−30
−1196%
Far Cry New Dawn 350−400
+1300%
24−27
−1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 190−200
+1257%
14−16
−1257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+1264%
10−12
−1264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 230−240
+1253%
16−18
−1253%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Far Cry 5 300−310
+1264%
21−24
−1264%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+1246%
24−27
−1246%
Hitman 3 230−240
+1253%
16−18
−1253%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Metro Exodus 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+1257%
14−16
−1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+1275%
8−9
−1275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 300−310
+1204%
21−24
−1204%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+1300%
10−11
−1300%
Hitman 3 140−150
+1300%
10−11
−1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+1300%
14−16
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1275%
8−9
−1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+1285%
13
−1285%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+1275%
8−9
−1275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+1289%
18−20
−1289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+1300%
14−16
−1300%
Metro Exodus 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%

This is how GTX 950 and ATI HD 4670 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is 1600% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950 is 2000% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.82 0.98
Recency 20 August 2015 10 September 2008
Cost $159 $67
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 59 Watt

The GeForce GTX 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1966 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 143 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.