ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3881555
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.17no data
Power efficiency10.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM206R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate57.021
Floating-point processing power1.825 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs486

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length202 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s166 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5340
+266900%
ATI 7200 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52no data
4K22no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
4K7.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 37 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 28 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2015 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 950 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 291.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2258 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.