GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GTX 950

Place in the ranking	375	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	13
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.79	67.32
Power efficiency	10.64	24.50
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM206	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 August 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 666% better value for money than GTX 950.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	7168
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	57.02	554.4
Floating-point processing power	1.825 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	48	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	202 mm	267 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.88

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.12
+463%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5339

RTX 4070 SUPER 30038
+463%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 950 8351

RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+719%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 950 6208

RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+687%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 950 37454

RTX 4070 SUPER 171098
+357%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	49 −345%	218 +345%
1440p	24−27 −496%	143 +496%
4K	23 −274%	86 +274%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.24 −18.1%	2.75 +18.1%
1440p	6.63 −58.2%	4.19 +58.2%
4K	6.91 +0.8%	6.97 −0.8%

RTX 4070 SUPER has 18% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER has 58% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 950 and RTX 4070 SUPER have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −644%	186 +644%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −456%	150−160 +456%
Elden Ring	40−45 −631%	300−350 +631%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −628%	182 +628%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −456%	150−160 +456%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −675%	434 +675%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −326%	140−150 +326%
Valorant	55−60 −696%	400−450 +696%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −536%	159 +536%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −456%	150−160 +456%
Dota 2	25 −592%	173 +592%
Elden Ring	40−45 −631%	300−350 +631%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −192%	152 +192%
Fortnite	75−80 −295%	300−350 +295%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −664%	428 +664%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 −368%	173 +368%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −94.7%	74 +94.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −113%	210−220 +113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −326%	140−150 +326%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −346%	170−180 +346%
Valorant	55−60 −696%	400−450 +696%
World of Tanks	180−190 −51.6%	270−280 +51.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −456%	139 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −456%	150−160 +456%
Dota 2	50−55 −460%	280−290 +460%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −183%	140−150 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −580%	381 +580%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −113%	210−220 +113%
Valorant	55−60 −696%	400−450 +696%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	20−22 −640%	148 +640%
Elden Ring	21−24 −948%	220−230 +948%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −640%	148 +640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −54.9%	170−180 +54.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −675%	90−95 +675%
World of Tanks	95−100 −427%	500−550 +427%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −211%	85−90 +211%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −625%	87 +625%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −450%	55−60 +450%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −703%	265 +703%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −357%	130−140 +357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −806%	154 +806%
Valorant	30−35 −985%	350−400 +985%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1033%	100−110 +1033%
Dota 2	28 −493%	166 +493%
Elden Ring	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Grand Theft Auto V	28 −493%	166 +493%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −722%	74 +722%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −410%	200−210 +410%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −611%	60−65 +611%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −493%	166 +493%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −600%	90−95 +600%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1033%	100−110 +1033%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Dota 2	24−27 −460%	140−150 +460%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −518%	100−110 +518%
Fortnite	16−18 −500%	95−100 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −595%	132 +595%
Valorant	14−16 −1333%	210−220 +1333%

This is how GTX 950 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 345% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 496% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 274% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 1333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4070 SUPER surpassed GTX 950 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.88	78.12
Recency	20 August 2015	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	220 Watt

GTX 950 has 144.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 462.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.