GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs 950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5
13.80
+7.9%

950 outperforms 1050 3GB Mobile by a small 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking350364
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.03no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM206no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 August 2015 (8 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$12.88 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Wattno data
Texture fill rate49.2 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance1,825 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length7.938" (20.2 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support++
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.80
+7.9%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.79

950 outperforms 1050 3GB Mobile by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 950 6208
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+3.1%

1050 3GB Mobile outperforms 950 by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
4K21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how GTX 950 and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is 16% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950 is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.80 12.79
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 89 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.