GeForce2 MX 200 LP vs GeForce GTX 950 LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGM206NV11 B3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2016 (8 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$118 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate57.020.7
Floating-point performance1,825 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length202 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.8 GB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.07.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDA5.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2016 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950 LP and GeForce2 MX 200 LP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
GeForce GTX 950 LP
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.