Tesla C2075 vs GeForce GTX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M with Tesla C2075, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.91
+13.5%

GTX 880M outperforms Tesla C2075 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.572.43
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK104GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536448
Core clock speed954 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt247 Watt
Texture fill rate127.132.14
Floating-point processing power3.05 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs12856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s150.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 880M 9.91
+13.5%
Tesla C2075 8.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 880M 3817
+13.5%
Tesla C2075 3364

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 880M 44
+7.3%
Tesla C2075 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Full HD56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
4K23
+27.8%
18−21
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+20%
85−90
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how GTX 880M and Tesla C2075 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 880M is 23% faster in 900p
  • GTX 880M is 24% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 880M is 28% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 8.73
Recency 12 March 2014 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 247 Watt

GTX 880M has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 102.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla C2075 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M is a notebook card while Tesla C2075 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.