Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 870M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 870M with Tesla M10, including specs and performance data.

GTX 870M
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.94
+8.8%

GTX 870M outperforms Tesla M10 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking485506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.182.53
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGK104GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344640
Core clock speed941 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed967 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate108.352.24
Floating-point processing power2.599 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs11240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 870M 8.94
+8.8%
Tesla M10 8.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 870M 3449
+8.8%
Tesla M10 3171

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 870M 9499
Tesla M10 11721
+23.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
4K19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+10%
80−85
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

This is how GTX 870M and Tesla M10 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 870M is 13% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 870M is 19% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.94 8.22
Recency 12 March 2014 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 870M has a 8.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 125% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla M10.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 870M is a notebook card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GeForce GTX 870M
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 870M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.