Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs GeForce GTX 860M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 860M
2014
4 GB GDDR5
7.82

Radeon RX 580 2048SP outperforms GeForce GTX 860M by a whopping 155% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking486265
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0427.94
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameN15P-GXPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)15 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price$875 $110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 2048SP has 2587% better value for money than GTX 860M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
CUDA cores1152 or 640no data
Core clock speed797 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHz1284 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40164.4
Floating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon RX 580 2048SP compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 860M 7.82
RX 580 2048SP 19.91
+155%

Radeon RX 580 2048SP outperforms GeForce GTX 860M by 155% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 860M 3027
RX 580 2048SP 7707
+155%

Radeon RX 580 2048SP outperforms GeForce GTX 860M by 155% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p91
−153%
230−240
+153%
Full HD37
−143%
90−95
+143%
4K13
−131%
30−35
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Hitman 3 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Hitman 3 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−150%
50−55
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hitman 3 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

This is how GTX 860M and RX 580 2048SP compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 2048SP is 153% faster in 900p
  • RX 580 2048SP is 143% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 2048SP is 131% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.82 19.91
Recency 12 March 2014 15 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 860M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 860M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 860M
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 412 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2540 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.