Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.91
+10%

GTX 780M outperforms HD 6970M Crossfire by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.59no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Blackcomb XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361920
Core clock speed823 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Wattno data
Texture fill rate102.0no data
Floating-point processing power2.448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.91
+10%
HD 6970M Crossfire 9.01

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780M 7777
+40.3%
HD 6970M Crossfire 5542

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780M 26827
+18.4%
HD 6970M Crossfire 22667

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+6.4%
94
−6.4%
Full HD65
−50.8%
98
+50.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Elden Ring 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Valorant 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Elden Ring 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.9%
35−40
−7.9%
Fortnite 55−60
+9.4%
50−55
−9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+8.5%
70−75
−8.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Valorant 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
World of Tanks 191
+43.6%
130−140
−43.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.9%
35−40
−7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+8.5%
70−75
−8.5%
Valorant 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Elden Ring 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+6.8%
40−45
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
World of Tanks 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Valorant 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Elden Ring 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Valorant 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

This is how GTX 780M and HD 6970M Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M is 6% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 51% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 780M is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 780M is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 9.01
Recency 11 May 2013 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GTX 780M has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 111 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.