GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs 780M

Aggregate performance score

GTX 780M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.93

1050 3 GB outperforms 780M by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking418360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.401.35
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXGP107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)21 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$1093 $1118

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780M has 4% better value for money than GTX 1050 3 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed823 MHz1392 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1518 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate102.072.86
Floating-point performance2,448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s84.1 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.93
GTX 1050 3 GB 13.27
+33.6%

1050 3 GB outperforms 780M by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780M 3839
GTX 1050 3 GB 5129
+33.6%

1050 3 GB outperforms 780M by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

This is how GTX 780M and GTX 1050 3 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 32% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.93 13.27
Recency 30 May 2013 21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 75 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 307 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.