RTX 2070 Super vs GTX 780M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 780M SLI
20.11

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 134% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking25663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money41.2046.40
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXTuring TU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (10 years old)2 July 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499
Current price$149 $261 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 13% better value for money than GTX 780M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed823 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors7080 Million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rateno data283.2

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M SLI and GeForce RTX 2070 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M SLI 20.11
RTX 2070 Super 47.07
+134%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 134% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M SLI 36004
RTX 2070 Super 89209
+148%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 148% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M SLI 14140
RTX 2070 Super 35032
+148%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 148% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M SLI 10091
RTX 2070 Super 24639
+144%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 144% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M SLI 66148
RTX 2070 Super 129295
+95.5%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780M SLI by 95% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
−36.4%
135
+36.4%
1440p35−40
−140%
84
+140%
4K21−24
−162%
55
+162%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−194%
94
+194%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−154%
104
+154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−151%
88
+151%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−76.1%
118
+76.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−246%
180
+246%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−163%
84
+163%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−132%
123
+132%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−107%
112
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−152%
174
+152%
Hitman 3 55−60
−203%
176
+203%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−158%
111
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−255%
117
+255%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−205%
131
+205%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−185%
111
+185%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−120%
90
+120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−111%
74
+111%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−53.7%
103
+53.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−167%
139
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−144%
78
+144%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−121%
117
+121%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−98.1%
107
+98.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−149%
172
+149%
Hitman 3 55−60
−166%
154
+166%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−102%
87
+102%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−181%
90
+181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−103%
67
+103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−186%
123
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−311%
181
+311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−146%
96
+146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−58.5%
65
+58.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−88.6%
66
+88.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−41.8%
95
+41.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−128%
73
+128%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−108%
110
+108%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−81.5%
98
+81.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−122%
153
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−127%
100
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−74.4%
68
+74.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−217%
95
+217%
Hitman 3 30−35
−206%
101
+206%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−133%
63
+133%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−200%
57
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
44
+193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−231%
86
+231%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−159%
57
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−179%
53
+179%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−84.4%
83
+84.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−292%
47
+292%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−188%
98
+188%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−133%
91
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−205%
125
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−236%
70−75
+236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−264%
51
+264%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55
+267%
Hitman 3 18−20
−189%
55
+189%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−46.2%
19
+46.2%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
37
+208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−155%
28
+155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−254%
46
+254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−224%
68
+224%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−220%
32
+220%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−130%
53
+130%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−475%
23
+475%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−238%
54
+238%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−200%
57
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−200%
84
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−222%
29
+222%

This is how GTX 780M SLI and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 36.4% faster than GTX 780M SLI

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 140% faster than GTX 780M SLI

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 162% faster than GTX 780M SLI

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 475% faster than the GTX 780M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Super surpassed GTX 780M SLI in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.11 47.07
Recency 30 May 2013 2 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 215 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4324 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.