Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780M Mac Edition
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
5.84
+175%

780M Mac Edition outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M Mac Edition
R5 (Bristol Ridge) R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620900
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.863.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGK104Bristol Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speed771 MHzno data
Boost clock speed797 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate102.0no data
Floating-point processing power2.448 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+150%
12
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 780M Mac Edition and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M Mac Edition is 150% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.84 2.12
Recency 8 November 2013 1 June 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 780M Mac Edition has a 175.5% higher aggregate performance score.

R5 (Bristol Ridge), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 916.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
R5 (Bristol Ridge) Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550 Mobile
GTX 850A GeForce GTX 850A
vs
ATI 9700 Radeon 9700
GTX 850A GeForce GTX 850A
vs
H200 NVL H200 NVL
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
R5 M240 Rebrand Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
Go 7450 GeForce Go 7450
GTX 780M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
vs
Go 7450 GeForce Go 7450
GT 740A GeForce GT 740A
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GTX 660M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
GT 430 PCI GeForce GT 430 PCI
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
ATI 9200 PRO Radeon 9200 PRO
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition or Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.