Radeon R5 M435 vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and Radeon R5 M435, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 780M Mac Edition outperforms R5 M435 by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 610 | 906 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.85 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | Jet |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 15 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.448 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 128 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.16 | 2.04 |
| Recency | 8 November 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
GTX 780M Mac Edition has a 202% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
R5 M435, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M435 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
