Radeon Pro W5500X vs GeForce GTX 780
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with Radeon Pro W5500X, including specs and performance data.
GTX 780 outperforms Pro W5500X by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 247 | 275 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.17 | 47.15 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | GK110 | Navi 14 |
Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 11 December 2019 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $599 |
Current price | $100 (0.2x MSRP) | $224 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Pro W5500X has 175% better value for money than GTX 780.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | 1757 MHz |
Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 125 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 173.2 | 168.7 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 14 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x HDMI 2.0b |
HDMI | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
CUDA | 3.5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 780 outperforms Radeon Pro W5500X by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
GeForce GTX 780 outperforms Radeon Pro W5500X by 9% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 54
+20%
| 45−50
−20%
|
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 20.73 | 19.04 |
Recency | 23 May 2013 | 11 December 2019 |
Cost | $649 | $599 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 125 Watt |
GTX 780 has a 8.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Pro W5500X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, its recommended price lower by $50, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon Pro W5500X.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W5500X is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.