Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 780
GTX 780 GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
VS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.98
+53.9%

GTX 780 outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 GTX 780
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.66no data
Power efficiency5.65no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGK110Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23048
Core clock speed863 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate173.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs192no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 780 19.98
+53.9%
Arc Graphics 140V 12.98
  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 7989
+54%
Arc Graphics 140V 5188

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780 10460
+10.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
+35%
40
−35%
1440p35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%
4K40−45
+37.9%
29
−37.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.02no data
1440p18.54no data
4K16.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+0%
41
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 780 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 is 35% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780 is 52% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 780 is 38% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.98 12.98
Recency 23 May 2013 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

GTX 780 has a 53.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 3070 TiM RTX 3070 TiM
vs
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
ATI X1950 PRO AGP Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
vs
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
Quadro K100M Quadro K100M
vs
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
9600M GS GeForce 9600M GS
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
MX450 N18S-G5 GeForce MX450 N18S-G5
vs
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
Iris Plus Graphics 645 Iris Plus Graphics 645
vs
GT 610 GeForce GT 610
GeForce 8400 GeForce 8400
vs
GT 545 GeForce GT 545
GeForce3 Ti500 GeForce3 Ti500
vs
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4
1079 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
31 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.