Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Ti GTX 670 GTX 680 GTX 680 Mac Edition GTX 690 GTX 760 GTX 760 OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 X2 GTX 770
VS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770 with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 230 Watt
13.28
+14.3%

GTX 770 outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 770 GTX 770
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.74no data
Power efficiency4.57no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGK104Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368
Core clock speed1046 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1085 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate138.9no data
Floating-point processing power3.333 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.3 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 770 13.28
+14.3%
Arc Graphics 140V 11.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770 5934
+14.3%
Arc Graphics 140V 5192

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 770 8150
Arc Graphics 140V 9492
+16.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+12.5%
40
−12.5%
1440p24−27
+4.3%
23
−4.3%
4K30−35
+3.4%
29
−3.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.87no data
1440p16.63no data
4K13.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+0%
41
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 770 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 770 is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 770 is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.28 11.62
Recency 30 May 2013 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

GTX 770 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
R9 380 Radeon R9 380
Graphics Radeon Graphics
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
RTX 2050 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
GT 705 OEM 705 OEM
RTX 3000 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
GTX 745 OEM 745 OEM
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile NVIDIA 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
GTX 760 X2 760 X2
TITAN Ada TITAN Ada
vs
GT 635 OEM 635 OEM
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
vs
GTX 650 Ti Boost 650 Ti Boost
9800 GTX GeForce 9800 GTX
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
9800 GX2 GeForce 9800 GX2
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 4060 Max-Q NVIDIA 4060 Max-Q
vs
GTX 660 660
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
vs
GTX 670 670

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 1701 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 30 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770 or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.