Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Radeon HD 3870 X2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
24.65
+1247%

GTX 780 Ti outperforms ATI HD 3870 X2 by a whopping 1247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking205877
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.270.04
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK110R680
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 November 2013 (10 years ago)26 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $449
Current price$461 (0.7x MSRP)$254 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780 Ti has 13075% better value for money than ATI HD 3870 X2.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880320
CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed875 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate210 billion/sec13.20
Floating-point performance5,345 gflops2x 528.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1802 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s57.66 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.65
+1247%
ATI HD 3870 X2 1.83

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 3870 X2 by 1247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780 Ti 9521
+1245%
ATI HD 3870 X2 708

GeForce GTX 780 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 3870 X2 by 1245% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+1257%
7−8
−1257%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 500−550
+1150%
40−45
−1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 600−650
+1177%
45−50
−1177%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+1179%
40−45
−1179%
Battlefield 5 1050−1100
+1196%
80−85
−1196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 650−700
+1200%
50−55
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 500−550
+1150%
40−45
−1150%
Far Cry 5 750−800
+1216%
55−60
−1216%
Far Cry New Dawn 850−900
+1228%
60−65
−1228%
Forza Horizon 4 1400−1450
+1208%
100−110
−1208%
Hitman 3 650−700
+1200%
50−55
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1300−1350
+1240%
95−100
−1240%
Metro Exodus 1050−1100
+1213%
80−85
−1213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 850−900
+1188%
65−70
−1188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1100−1150
+1210%
80−85
−1210%
Watch Dogs: Legion 900−950
+1186%
70−75
−1186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 600−650
+1177%
45−50
−1177%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+1179%
40−45
−1179%
Battlefield 5 1050−1100
+1196%
80−85
−1196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 650−700
+1200%
50−55
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 500−550
+1150%
40−45
−1150%
Far Cry 5 750−800
+1216%
55−60
−1216%
Far Cry New Dawn 850−900
+1228%
60−65
−1228%
Forza Horizon 4 1400−1450
+1208%
100−110
−1208%
Hitman 3 650−700
+1200%
50−55
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1300−1350
+1240%
95−100
−1240%
Metro Exodus 1050−1100
+1213%
80−85
−1213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 850−900
+1188%
65−70
−1188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1100−1150
+1210%
80−85
−1210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 750−800
+1239%
55−60
−1239%
Watch Dogs: Legion 900−950
+1186%
70−75
−1186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 600−650
+1177%
45−50
−1177%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+1179%
40−45
−1179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 650−700
+1200%
50−55
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 500−550
+1150%
40−45
−1150%
Far Cry 5 750−800
+1216%
55−60
−1216%
Forza Horizon 4 1400−1450
+1208%
100−110
−1208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1300−1350
+1240%
95−100
−1240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1100−1150
+1210%
80−85
−1210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 750−800
+1239%
55−60
−1239%
Watch Dogs: Legion 900−950
+1186%
70−75
−1186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 850−900
+1188%
65−70
−1188%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 600−650
+1177%
45−50
−1177%
Far Cry New Dawn 700−750
+1246%
50−55
−1246%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+1246%
24−27
−1246%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 400−450
+1112%
30−35
−1112%
Cyberpunk 2077 210−220
+1213%
16−18
−1213%
Far Cry 5 550−600
+1210%
40−45
−1210%
Forza Horizon 4 650−700
+1227%
45−50
−1227%
Hitman 3 350−400
+1107%
27−30
−1107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+1175%
50−55
−1175%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+1177%
45−50
−1177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 700−750
+1196%
50−55
−1196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+1233%
30−33
−1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+1233%
18−20
−1233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 550−600
+1241%
40−45
−1241%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 250−260
+1216%
18−20
−1216%
Hitman 3 250−260
+1216%
18−20
−1216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+1194%
16−18
−1194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 350−400
+1196%
27−30
−1196%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 200−210
+1233%
14−16
−1233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 170−180
+1208%
12−14
−1208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180−190
+1186%
14−16
−1186%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+1186%
14−16
−1186%
Forza Horizon 4 450−500
+1224%
30−35
−1224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+1150%
27−30
−1150%
Metro Exodus 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+1173%
10−12
−1173%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 280−290
+1233%
21−24
−1233%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and ATI HD 3870 X2 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Ti is 1257% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.65 1.83
Recency 7 November 2013 26 January 2008
Cost $699 $449
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 165 Watt

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3870 X2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
Radeon HD 3870 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 628 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.