GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
22.59
+74.4%

GTX 780 Ti outperforms GTX 760 Ti OEM by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Power efficiency6.885.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110BGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 November 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28801344
Core clock speed875 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate222.7109.8
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPS2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs240112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 780 Ti 22.59
+74.4%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 12.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9465
+74.4%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 5427

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 780 Ti 28407
+101%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 14104

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 780 Ti 103
+119%
GTX 760 Ti OEM 47

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%
Fortnite 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Valorant 160−170
+80%
90−95
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+74.7%
75−80
−74.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+80.7%
140−150
−80.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Dota 2 120−130
+84.6%
65−70
−84.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%
Fortnite 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Valorant 160−170
+80%
90−95
−80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Dota 2 120−130
+84.6%
65−70
−84.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+84%
50−55
−84%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Valorant 160−170
+80%
90−95
−80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+76.9%
65−70
−76.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+82.2%
90−95
−82.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+83.2%
95−100
−83.2%
Valorant 190−200
+80.9%
110−120
−80.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Valorant 130−140
+78.7%
75−80
−78.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Dota 2 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and GTX 760 Ti OEM compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Ti is 75% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.59 12.95
Recency 7 November 2013 27 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 170 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has a 74.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 760 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has 47.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 714 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 91 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Ti or GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.