GeForce GTX 280M vs GTX 780 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti with GeForce GTX 280M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
24.70
+1558%

GTX 780 Ti outperforms GTX 280M by a whopping 1558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking220978
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.33no data
Power efficiency6.891.39
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK110BG92
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 November 2013 (11 years ago)3 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880128
Core clock speed875 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate222.737.44
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPS0.3745 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data562
ROPs4816
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-IV
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options++
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sUp to 950 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.70
+1558%
GTX 280M 1.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9527
+1557%
GTX 280M 575

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780 Ti 38813
+482%
GTX 280M 6672

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+1880%
5−6
−1880%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.06no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
Hitman 3 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+660%
14−16
−660%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+1600%
5−6
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+938%
8−9
−938%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+209%
30−35
−209%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
Hitman 3 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+660%
14−16
−660%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+1600%
5−6
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+938%
8−9
−938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+382%
10−12
−382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+209%
30−35
−209%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
Hitman 3 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+660%
14−16
−660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+938%
8−9
−938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+382%
10−12
−382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+209%
30−35
−209%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+2033%
3−4
−2033%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1663%
8−9
−1663%
Hitman 3 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+1900%
7−8
−1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Hitman 3 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1714%
7−8
−1714%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and GTX 280M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Ti is 1880% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 780 Ti is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 780 Ti surpassed GTX 280M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.70 1.49
Recency 7 November 2013 3 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has a 1557.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 280M, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 280M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 280M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 649 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.