RTX A400 vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Place in the ranking	427	417
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.25	no data
Power efficiency	2.98	15.58
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GK110B	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	10 September 2013 (11 years ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	768
Core clock speed	863 MHz	727 MHz
Boost clock speed	902 MHz	1762 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	173.2	42.29
Floating-point processing power	4.156 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	192	24
Tensor Cores	no data	24
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	163 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.5	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.78	11.27
Recency	10 September 2013	16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	50 Watt

RTX A400 has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and RTX A400.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.