FirePro V4900 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.39
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Turks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 November 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344480
Core clock speed993 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate117.219.20
Floating-point processing power2.812 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2016 1 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 760 OEM has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro V4900, on the other hand, has 126.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM and FirePro V4900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 OEM is a desktop card while FirePro V4900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 141 vote

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.