Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K2200M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Quadro K4000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.23
+98.1%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms K4000M by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
K4000M K4000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.04no data
Power efficiency2.973.75
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110BGK104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304960
Core clock speed863 MHz601 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate173.248.08
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS1.154 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19280
L1 Cache192 KB80 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s89.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+91.5%
47
−91.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 780 Rev. 2 and K4000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 91% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.23 4.66
Recency 10 September 2013 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 98.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

K4000M, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K4000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Quadro K4000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
K4000M Quadro K4000M
vs
Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4130
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
GT 720M 720M
GTX 760 X2 NVIDIA GTX 760 X2
vs
P5000 X2 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
R5 M240 Rebrand M240 Rebrand
GTX 760 Ti OEM NVIDIA 760 Ti OEM
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB 3060 8 GB
GTX 780 6 GB NVIDIA GTX 780 6 GB
vs
RX 570 X2 570 X2
GTX 760 OEM NVIDIA GTX 760 OEM
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 NVIDIA GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB VLB
GT 640 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
B100
GTX 645 OEM NVIDIA GTX 645 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics 710 710
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics P4600 P4600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Quadro K4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or Quadro K4000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.