B100 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.03no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameGK208GB102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)November 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416896 ×2
Core clock speed1046 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1837 MHz
Number of transistors915 million104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate33.47969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs824 ×2
TMUs32528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB96 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1252 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s4.1 TB/s ×2
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.510.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 1000 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 1940.8% lower power consumption.

B100, on the other hand, has a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and B100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while B100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA B100
B100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate B100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or B100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.