FirePro V4900 vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2270 2270 1GB Edition 2270 PCIe x1 V3900 V4900 FireStream 9370 V3800 V4800 V5800 V7800 V8800 V9800

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with FirePro V4900, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.77
+307%

780 Rev. 2 outperforms V4900 by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
Power efficiency3.002.46
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK110BTurks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2013 (12 years ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304480
Core clock speed863 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate173.219.20
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs19224
L1 Cache192 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.77 2.40
Recency 10 September 2013 1 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 307.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro V4900, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V4900 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V4900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R5 235X OEM 235X OEM
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7950 Mac Edition 7950 Mac Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5730 5730
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GT 710M 710M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 680MX Mac Edition GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GRID K340 K340
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4700 4700
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder HD HD
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 3870 Mac Edition 3870 Mac Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 3830 3830

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 156 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or FirePro V4900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.