UHD Graphics 617 vs GeForce GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	477	866
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.52	10.29
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	Amber Lake GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)	7 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	192
Core clock speed	719 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	25.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	3
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	Ring Bus
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 775M 9.08
+322%

UHD Graphics 617 2.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+322%

UHD Graphics 617 862

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
+294%

UHD Graphics 617 1541

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

65−70
+306%

−306%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +270%	10−11 −270%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27	0−1
Metro Exodus	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Valorant	35−40 +350%	8−9 −350%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Dota 2	30−35 +580%	5 −580%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +200%	13 −200%
Fortnite	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +270%	10−11 −270%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +236%	22 −236%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +222%	9−10 −222%
Valorant	35−40 +350%	8−9 −350%
World of Tanks	130−140 +229%	40−45 −229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Dota 2	30−35 +143%	14 −143%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +179%	14−16 −179%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +270%	10−11 −270%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +236%	21−24 −236%
Valorant	35−40 +350%	8−9 −350%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4	0−1
Dota 2	12−14	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
World of Tanks	65−70 +353%	14−16 −353%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Valorant	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4	0−1
Dota 2	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Fortnite	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8	0−1
Valorant	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%

This is how GTX 775M and UHD Graphics 617 compete in popular games:

GTX 775M is 306% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 775M is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 775M surpassed UHD Graphics 617 in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.08	2.15
Recency	24 September 2013	7 November 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt

GTX 775M has a 322.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 617, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 617 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 775M

UHD Graphics 617

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.3 78 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M or UHD Graphics 617, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.