UHD Graphics 617 vs GeForce GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and UHD Graphics 617, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.23
+321%

GTX 775M outperforms UHD Graphics 617 by a whopping 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking477866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4910.26
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2Amber Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344192
Core clock speed719 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPsno data3
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3600 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 775M 9.23
+321%
UHD Graphics 617 2.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+322%
UHD Graphics 617 862

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
+294%
UHD Graphics 617 1541

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+300%
15
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Fortnite 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+255%
10−12
−255%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
Valorant 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+224%
40−45
−224%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Dota 2 65−70
+333%
15
−333%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Fortnite 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+255%
10−12
−255%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Valorant 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Dota 2 65−70
+364%
14
−364%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+255%
10−12
−255%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Valorant 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+353%
14−16
−353%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Valorant 100−105
+488%
16−18
−488%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 45−50
+318%
10−12
−318%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 775M and UHD Graphics 617 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 775M is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is ahead in 56 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.23 2.19
Recency 24 September 2013 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 775M has a 321.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 617, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 617 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
Intel UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 617

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 78 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M or UHD Graphics 617, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.