GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	474	302
Place by popularity	not in top-100	29
Power efficiency	6.50	28.62
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)	17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	2048
Core clock speed	719 MHz	1185 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	94.53
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 8.82

RTX 2050 Mobile 17.47
+98.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071

RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+106%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −100%	42 +100%
1440p	16−18 −106%	33 +106%
4K	12−14 −108%	25 +108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −112%	36 +112%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −158%	49 +158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −100%	34 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −10.5%	21 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −100%	76 +100%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −104%	49 +104%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −96.2%	50−55 +96.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −76%	40−45 +76%
Valorant	35−40 −142%	87 +142%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −58.8%	27 +58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +26.7%	15 −26.7%
Dota 2	30−35 −150%	85 +150%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −79.5%	70 +79.5%
Fortnite	55−60 −81.8%	100−105 +81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −65.8%	63 +65.8%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −103%	69 +103%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −96.2%	50−55 +96.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −73%	120−130 +73%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −76%	40−45 +76%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −100%	55−60 +100%
Valorant	35−40 −19.4%	43 +19.4%
World of Tanks	130−140 −61.6%	220−230 +61.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −35.3%	23 +35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +46.2%	13 −46.2%
Dota 2	30−35 −224%	110 +224%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −61.5%	60−65 +61.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −47.4%	56 +47.4%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −37.5%	33 +37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −73%	120−130 +73%
Valorant	35−40 −111%	75−80 +111%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −208%	37 +208%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −208%	37 +208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −282%	160−170 +282%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
World of Tanks	65−70 −88.2%	120−130 +88.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −111%	35−40 +111%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −145%	45−50 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −124%	47 +124%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −147%	40−45 +147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Valorant	24−27 −100%	45−50 +100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Dota 2	20−22 −60%	30−35 +60%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −60%	30−35 +60%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −107%	55−60 +107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −60%	30−35 +60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Dota 2	20−22 −70%	34 +70%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Fortnite	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −133%	27−30 +133%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Valorant	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%

This is how GTX 775M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 106% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 775M is 46% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 282% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 775M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.82	17.47
Recency	24 September 2013	17 December 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 98.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.