GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 775M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.43

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 775M by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469296
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Power efficiency6.4628.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442048
Core clock speed719 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data94.53
Floating-point processing powerno data6.05 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.43
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.68
+98.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+106%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−100%
42
+100%
1440p16−18
−113%
34
+113%
4K12−14
−108%
25
+108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−227%
49
+227%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−82.6%
40−45
+82.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−200%
42
+200%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−180%
42
+180%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−100%
40−45
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−85.7%
110−120
+85.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−144%
44
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−75%
90−95
+75%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−96.8%
60−65
+96.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−44.3%
85−90
+44.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−82.6%
40−45
+82.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−50%
21
+50%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−100%
30
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−100%
40−45
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−85.7%
110−120
+85.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−139%
43
+139%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−75%
90−95
+75%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−100%
62
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−61.5%
40−45
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−44.3%
85−90
+44.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−82.6%
40−45
+82.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−66.7%
25
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−100%
40−45
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−85.7%
110−120
+85.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−117%
39
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−75%
90−95
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−77.4%
55
+77.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−26.9%
33
+26.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+239%
18
−239%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−100%
27−30
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−151%
100−110
+151%
Hitman 3 12−14
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−162%
30−35
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−327%
47
+327%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−85%
110−120
+85%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−146%
95−100
+146%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

This is how GTX 775M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 113% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 775M is 239% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 327% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.43 18.68
Recency 24 September 2013 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 98.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2197 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.