GeForce MX570 vs GTX 770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.97

MX570 outperforms GTX 770M by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.49no data
Power efficiency6.6541.05
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602048
Core clock speed811 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate63.7673.92
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs2440
TMUs8064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 6.97
GeForce MX570 14.34
+106%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2784
GeForce MX570 5729
+106%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
+19.5%
41
−19.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−109%
45−50
+109%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−116%
40−45
+116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−80%
35−40
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−109%
45−50
+109%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%
Dota 2 24−27
+108%
12
−108%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−113%
68
+113%
Fortnite 40−45
−93%
80−85
+93%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−112%
50−55
+112%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−116%
40−45
+116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−81.4%
100−110
+81.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−80%
35−40
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Valorant 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
World of Tanks 151
−27.8%
190−200
+27.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−109%
45−50
+109%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%
Dota 2 24−27
−116%
50−55
+116%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−81.4%
100−110
+81.4%
Valorant 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−241%
130−140
+241%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
World of Tanks 50−55
−100%
100−110
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Valorant 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Dota 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−110%
40−45
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Fortnite 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Valorant 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

This is how GTX 770M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770M is 20% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M is 108% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 241% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 770M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 63 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.97 14.34
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 770M has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 105.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 129 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.