Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with Tesla M10, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.92
+66%

770M SLI outperforms M10 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.442.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920640 ×4
Core clock speed811 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1306 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.24 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data16 ×4
TMUsno data40 ×4
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Valorant 110−120
+70.8%
65−70
−70.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+79%
100−105
−79%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Dota 2 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Valorant 110−120
+70.8%
65−70
−70.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Dota 2 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Valorant 110−120
+70.8%
65−70
−70.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+72.3%
65−70
−72.3%
Valorant 130−140
+68.8%
80−85
−68.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Valorant 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.92 7.18
Recency 30 May 2013 18 May 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 66% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M10 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or Tesla M10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.